How to Create an NI 43-101 Compliant Map

An NI 43-101 report map figure is expected to include a title with project and figure number, scale bar, north arrow, legend, coordinate/projection note, data source, effective date, and clean legible styling. Exploration Maps includes all of these elements — turn them on, fill in the title block, and export as PDF at 3× pixel ratio.

Example mining map created in Exploration Maps
A finished map exported from Exploration Maps — the kind of output this guide walks you to.
Turn public claim data into a clean map. No GIS experience needed — import, style, and export in minutes.
Open Exploration Maps →

The standard figure checklist

Technical report figures follow strong conventions. Before any map goes to your QP, it should carry:

  • Title block: project name, figure title, figure number
  • Company name and map date (effective date of the data)
  • Scale bar (true ground distance) and north arrow
  • Legend covering every symbol and line style on the figure
  • Location/index inset so the reader can place the map
  • Data sources (e.g. 'Claim boundaries: BC Mineral Titles Online, retrieved 2026-07-06')
  • Legible styling in print: no reliance on subtle colour differences

Where each element lives in Exploration Maps

RequirementWhereNotes
Title, company, dateTitle block (Design section)Shows project, subtitle, and date; add figure number to the title text
Scale bar / north arrowDesign section togglesTrue-distance scale bar; corner-assignable
LegendPer-layer legend settingsEvery visible layer can carry a legend entry — audit before export
Location insetInset map (Design section)Province/state inset places the property automatically
Source & datum noteFooter textE.g. 'WGS84 / Web Mercator. Claims: MTO, 2026-07-06. Not an official tenure record.'
Print qualityExport settingsPDF, Letter/A4, pixel ratio 3×

Build it in order

  • Import claims/drillholes/targets and assign roles so styling follows convention
  • Choose the Light basemap — it prints cleanly and keeps data prominent
  • Fill the title block: project, figure title and number, company, date
  • Enable scale bar, north arrow, legend, and the location inset
  • Add the footer source/datum note
  • Set Letter or A4 ratio, frame the figure, export PDF at 3× pixel ratio

What compliance actually means here

Your QP decides — this is figure craft, not legal advice
NI 43-101 is a disclosure standard, and the Qualified Person signing the report decides what its figures must show. The checklist above reflects standard expectations reviewers look for, not a legal guarantee of compliance. Always have the QP review final figures — and verify tenure data against the official registry before it appears in a report.
Build a report-ready figure in minutes. Standard elements on by default — title block, scale, legend, inset.
Open Exploration Maps →
Import your file and export an investor-ready map. Open the editor and have a shareable map in minutes.
Open Exploration Maps →

Frequently Asked Questions

Does NI 43-101 formally list required map elements?
The instrument requires that maps be legible and support the disclosure (location, tenure, results), and Form 43-101F1 requires certain maps (e.g. location, property). The specific elements — scale, north arrow, legend, sources — are standard professional practice that QPs and reviewers expect on every figure.
What projection/datum note should I use?
State what the map uses — for Exploration Maps exports that's WGS84 geographic data rendered in Web Mercator. A footer like 'WGS84 / Web Mercator; claim boundaries from [registry], retrieved [date]' covers datum, source, and currency in one line.
Can I use a satellite basemap in a technical report figure?
Yes, where imagery adds information (access, terrain, disturbance) — typically the location/access figure. For claim plats and results figures, the Light basemap keeps line work legible in print.
What export settings make a figure print-ready?
PDF at Letter or A4 page size with pixel ratio 3× — roughly 300 DPI equivalent. Check that the smallest text on the figure is still readable at 100% print size.
Is registry claim data reliable enough for a report figure?
Registry pulls are the right starting point, but tenure changes; verify ownership, status, and boundaries against the official registry as of the report's effective date, and date-stamp the source in the figure. The report's QP has final responsibility for the data shown.
Do I need a location inset on every figure?
Not every figure — but the property-location figure needs one, and small-scale detail figures benefit from one so readers stay oriented. It's one toggle, so the practical answer is: include it unless it crowds the figure.